Roberts
invokes these two identities during the key biases and gaps in the current body
of research. He distinguishes that
in this clash it is really the executives that stifle the creative process of
television and movies by keeping control over the production and distribution
of these platforms. It is not
suprising to find out that there is a clash between the creative and commercial
sides of the business. This seems
to be a trend in any sort of business that has a creative aspect to it. Artists constantly claim to be stifled
by commercial or business motives.
It is interesting, however, that Robert’s notes that creative writers go
through the internal process of assessing whether something will be able to be
a commercial success if it is picked up. The internal dialogue of executives is much more business
focused: “Can we sell it, is it marketable, is it even good.” The question of is it even that good is
basically a secondary question after executives figure out if they can even
sell and market the movie.
It
seems through Robert’s research that the creative side is not as slighted as
one might initially think. Through
his research there were opinions that were pulled showing that writters were actually
shrude businessmen in their conduct over rights and royalties. It is interesting to note that in today’s
climate everyone understands the value of making a buck and therefore both
creative and executives do what is nessecary to squeeze as much money out of a
production as possible. It seems
that while there is a creative/commercial struggle that still drives some of
Hollywood/broadcasting, the culture is very risk averse due to the large price
tags of productions. I think that now
in this enormous industry that both creative and executives are adjusting their
practices to be the most economically efficient, instead of argue of creative
rights. I think this is why some
of the only artistically driven movies that become commercial have to have
success at major film festivals before they are picked up by big studious, and
that this is the reason for much of the blandness that surrounds the movie and
television industry.
No comments:
Post a Comment