Showing posts with label consumerism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label consumerism. Show all posts

Monday, March 5, 2012

TV industry in the digital age

Broadcast television relies primarily on advertising for its revenue stream. However, with technological advances in the television industry, this revenue channel is being threatened as more and more people are beginning to adopt alternative means of consuming TV. However, broadcast television has seen ad revenues decline at an increasing rate. Primary threat to ad revenue comes from various media options available to the consumers. Online TV is becoming increasingly popular, as TV audience no longer has to follow the broadcast TV schedule, and watch the TV content on their portable device. Moreover, to add to that, digitalization of the industry has not only made piracy easy, but pirated contents are also fairly easy to find today. Shifting to this form of TV has allowed consumers to enjoy television content without any advertisement disruptions. In addition, things like Google TV that provides free access to content only intensifies the challenges for broadcast television. DVRs are another means through which broadcast television ads are being threatened while giving more power to the consumers. More ad-free media technology such as Netflix and iTunes are also hampering the broadcast television business.

Due to various factors, broadcasters have had to adopt alternative means to continue a profitable business. Retransmission fees is one such way that they have tried to do this so that broadcast television can take advantage of the cable operators and try to gain back some of the loss in ad revenues. Moreover, with the technological advances, interactive tv has also become increasingly popular. Through this, broadcast television can try to get some of the advertisement revenues on this “second screen” that consumers are increasing along with their traditional television. Another way they can adopt to the change in this industry is by integrating advertisements within the show that won’t disrupt the viewers. They will also need to look for additional platforms to provide reruns of their show so that they can make up some of the loss in revenue. Time warner has embraced this idea of “TV everywhere to adapt to the economic threats provided by the loss in ad revenues.

These economic shifts have also impacted the content in this industry. Because content producers now have to compete with the free content available online, their incentive for creative content has been decreasing. Because, their profit is being challenged, they have to avoid taking excessive risks, thereby playing safe, often compromising creativity. In addition, this has also led to an even more “consumerism” within television. Farrell illustrates how branded entertainment and branded content are being integrated in the television industry these days.

Due to these various factors, the TV industry will have to change their model to adapt to the economic and technological shifts. One such way that they can do this is to add a "merchandising" aspect to this model, where they could sell small artifacts such as coffee mugs or t-shirts that feature the TV shows. They could also have "live shows" that audience can buy tickets for. For example, if there is a show like Glee or American Idol, they could have live concerts featured by the artists in the respective shows. They could also have ticket shows for talk shows or other reality shows for which the audience would pay the extra $ to see the artists outside of their TV screens. Therefore, as illustrated in the diagram below, the TV industry will have to move beyond the 3-party model to accommodate to the changes in the industry.


Sunday, February 12, 2012

Consumerism, Media, and Digital Democracy

Do you notice when you search for a new pair of shoes, an Ipod, or a piece of clothing that all of a sudden every digital ad you come across is that product or others which are very similar?  This is one of the primary issues of media for the Center for Digital Democracy (CDD).  Their mission is to help protect consumers from an internet experienced which is "largely shaped to help advertisers."  The online advertising industry is a booming industry which was worth 24 billion (yes folks BILLION) dollars in 2008 and had a projected increase to 100 billion dollars by 2011.

Why does any of this matter; we can all ignore ads right?  The CDD is not concerned with the ads themselves or even the fact that the industry is corporate and ad driven as opposed to consumer driven; what matters to the CDD is the awareness of the consumer.  They strive to "keep consumers informed and the corporate ad industry accountable." 

Is this an issue does it really matter that we have someone shadowing our every move on the internet, what are the consequences of a culture and ad-based internet?  These questions loom large in our new share-everything mediated society.  This issue of being shadowed has the negatives of the idea of "Big Brother;" a system where every move you make is monitored.  It also has its positives of convenience and economic profit; if it finds a product you like and can display it in an easy click add that makes everyone's life a little easier. 

I believe the CDD's action is the proper action to be taken against this "issue" (notice the "" because I do not believe everyone believes this to be a problem); and that is to continue to inform consumers while holding this big ad agencies and big business accountable for what they are placing on the internet.  A world without these ads would be so foreign to us that demolishing them entirely would be alien, but at the same time they need to be held accountable to ensure that commercialism does not get out of control in this precarious media teeter-totter.